Chromophobia v1 (Mod+Skin) [Release]

TaxiService · Post by **TaxiService** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:23 am

Cortana wrote:What program are you talking about?

ESCHATON!

the application forged by the gods!

dont be blaspheme!

Jello! · Post by **Jello!** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:47 am

TaxiService wrote:
Cortana wrote:What program are you talking about?
ESCHATON!

the application forged by the gods!

Ahem. god.
(isn't it?)

Eclipse · Post by **Eclipse** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:53 am

depending on what religion you are it could be gods

TaxiService · Post by **TaxiService** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:20 am

depends of what religion?

its like an... association, them are all there, from Buddha to Nudimmud, from Jesus to Antigone etc etc...

i hate religions

them ruined humanity (so humanity riuned itself... like every time... like every thing humans created...)

Dustyjjc · Post by **Dustyjjc** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 5:36 am

Why'd you guys vote 1-2/10 on my mod? You make me feel sad.

P!ckoff · Post by **P!ckoff** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:22 am

Application formed by Altimit (mostly). What can I say? I am an atheist. I think Taxi was trying to be funny. And it looks like I have found, finally, another atheist in Taxi.

TaxiService · Post by **TaxiService** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:54 am

ehehe... atheist? you are devil currently... you look more like satanist

XD ghahaedhasdghs.. ._.

EDIT: souvenirs!

Moxus · Post by **Moxus** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:56 am

Yay! Pickoff is the Devil!

-=Moxus=-

P!ckoff · Post by **P!ckoff** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:14 pm

mmm.... satanic.

Btw: links for Atheism for those who don't understand.
http://www.atheist.net/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/ ... ments.html

That picture is my FaceBook profile pic now

TaxiService · Post by **TaxiService** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:32 pm

thanks for teh links, but

my atheism is like a "who cares about religion?" thing. <_<

looks like atheism is anothe religion XD

PS: and, infidels.org? XD hshehahsadhh i cant stop laugh XDDD

Post by **Altimit01** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:33 pm

Religious discussion = teh phail. Each one is a logical system based on different postulates or axioms. Therefore there can be no resolution of arguments since a postulate/axiom has no logical basis and is just accepted as being true (becoming the starting point for the entire system). It'd be like trying to disprove a theorem in Euclidean geometry using Riemannain geomety. It just doesn't work.

And for the record, solipsism trumps all. Just try to argue with it.

P!ckoff · Post by **P!ckoff** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:42 pm

I dont think so. I think that that holds true for religions, but not beliefs like atheism. Atheism is backed up by scientific fact, in fact, created by science. Scientific laws cannot be broken, so when they conflict with religion, religion loses. Except that religion has been the only answer to all of life's questions for so long that there is only a select few people who can see that truth in its raw state, without being biased by their religious beliefs. I think that religion worked fine for 2,000+ years, but it has also caused some of the worst occurrences the world has ever seen. Event like the crusades, the Holocaust, the current terrorist threat are all based in religious differences. Since we now can abate our never-ending desire for answers with unbiased, universal discoveries of science while losing the bloodshed, why not ditch religion?

Also, prove that your mind exists. Really, try.

TaxiService · Post by **TaxiService** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:20 pm

Altimit <--- i'm not sure if i got what wiki says, so here's questions:

my mind is the only thing that exists? my body, teh cosmos, all material stuff doesnt?

pickoff's mind dosent exists too? (pickoff was the first name bumped in my head)

Pickoff <---

<your post should go here>

heheh, scientific facts can be broken by other scientific facts!

humanity created religion for some reasons that i'll not list. in my advise, it was bigger error of all teh times, but humanity needed to.

"it worked for 2000+ years" <_< meh... remember when religions was against scientific progresses, or when religious slayed thought witches, or look that morons that fight from 5000 years for a lil piece of gound...

PS: ditch religion means "end a relationship with religion"? <_<
sorry but, you know...

Post by **Altimit01** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:19 pm

P!ckoff wrote:I dont think so. I think that that holds true for religions, but not beliefs like atheism. Atheism is backed up by scientific fact, in fact, created by science. Scientific laws cannot be broken, so when they conflict with religion, religion loses. Except that religion has been the only answer to all of life's questions for so long that there is only a select few people who can see that truth in its raw state, without being biased by their religious beliefs. I think that religion worked fine for 2,000+ years, but it has also caused some of the worst occurrences the world has ever seen. Event like the crusades, the Holocaust, the current terrorist threat are all based in religious differences. Since we now can abate our never-ending desire for answers with unbiased, universal discoveries of science while losing the bloodshed, why not ditch religion?

There is so much wrong with that statement. Athiesm has little do with science by definition. Science can neither prove nor deny the existence of a diety. Also, science is not at all free from bias or postulation. Newtonian physics for example is merely an approximation but is not truly accurate and the theory of relativity is only true if one assumes the speed of light in vacuum to be constant. The idea that someone can be truly "unbiased" in any sense of the word is laughable. One can acknowledge biases and try to move past them but they are an inevitable part of being human. Blaming religion for any of those events is taking a simplified view of things. The crusades were more related to population pressure and political issues than any thing related to doctrine. It just so happened at the time the most politically powerful figure was a pope. The holocaust wasn't about religion on either side. National Socialism made some pretense to Christianity but was more a socio-political philosophy based on the superiority of the German state and the Arian race. Which is why those events were targeted at the Jewish people (ever hear the term "ethnic Jew"?) along with Gypsies and Homosexuals. Terrorism has nothing to do with religious teachings. It has far more to do with social issues and charismatic individuals who preach a hate that is vieled under the guise of religion. By contrast, the Soviet purges had roughly 3 million victims. Not a bad count for a country that outlawed religion. It's a handy scapegoat, but in the end it's always people not belief systems or institutions that are guilty of such horror. As for scientific progress, I challenge you to name ten important cases in which science was in direct conflict with religion. (For the record, the largest operator of observatories during the middle ages: the church. Who invented the hospital: the medieval Islamic world. In fact, the scientific method is credited to an Arab during the dark ages which weren't so dark in the empire)

@Taxi:
Think of a brain in a jar. It doesn't sense anything, but it constructs an entire universe of imagination. Everything it meets, sees, talks to and interacts with is merely it's own imagination.

TaxiService · Post by **TaxiService** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:28 pm

Altimit01 wrote:@Taxi:
Think of a brain in a jar. It doesn't sense anything, but it constructs an entire universe of imagination. Everything it meets, sees, talks to and interacts with is merely it's own imagination.

oh no..
oh nononnoo augh, damn you altimit. . . (btw, it remembers me Matrix a bit... XD)

that can be horribly true o_o

wait a fucking second, that cant b.. DAMN YOU!

however, i'm out of this discussion, my dictionary is too little to continue

Mac Gaming Mods

Chromophobia v1 (Mod+Skin) [Release]

Rate this mod or DIE! (Outta 10)

Who is online