It's out and plays very well. I like it better than Rainbow 6.
It's only $40 as well.
Close Combat: First to Fight
Yeah, you can get it for $39 with free shipping at amazon.com.
Here's one of the main forums for the game:
http://www.closecombat.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=56
Here's one of the main forums for the game:
http://www.closecombat.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=56
-
- Peon
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 10:27 am
- Location: los angeles memorial coliseum
- Contact:
health packs . . . bad. but many other things in this game . . . are good! cool ai. lotsa tactics. pretty easy squad command. some sneaking. some mayhem. and seemingly modest system requirements. just starting out with the SP. check img for the preview and interview articles.
people think all we do is lie around and think of how rich we'd be if we didn't think life could improve
Actually it was based on the training tool. It was in the Macworld ad I think.Monoman wrote:AA was made as a recruiting tool. Close Combat was not based on a training tool, you are thinking of Full Spectrum Warrior. Close Combat was just based on Marine tactics and when you create a military based game why wouldn't you base it on the actual military.
I would get this game because I thought AA was awesome but
1) I don't have 40 dollars.
2) I have a G3 iBook with only 466 mhz. But I do play some of the anti- low processor games on my brother's computer.
3) If I did have 40 dollars, I would be buying Jedi Academy or Battlefield.
4) I just bought Battlefront and I won't be buying anything for a while. I still have some money, but my mom won't let me buy games.
5) I also want to keep some money so I can buy War of the Worlds when it comes out on DVD.
6) I am just rambling now...
Pfhor are like women. They are always getting on your nerves.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests