I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:18 am

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=valdres+battalion+fanfare

Analyze and comment. I mean, seriously.

tokage · Post by **tokage** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:07 pm

I'm incredibly confused right now. Sparky has a problem with Switzerland or...?

Kayar · Post by **Kayar** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:14 pm

Yes, I do not understand why this song is an issue, nor what the issue is exactly.

Amy · Post by **Amy** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:31 pm

Is it the ads on LMGTFY?

Sven · Post by **Sven** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:21 pm

Eh, what?

Smythe · Post by **Smythe** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:22 am

Incessant rambling of which nobody here knows anything about, nor gives a flying tit in order to create a conversation in which sparky is obviously better equipped than ourselves to talk about, not that we care anyway?

Zanghfei · Post by **Zanghfei** » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:46 am

So Valdres was existed before? (I don't think I clearly undertand.)

Kayar · Post by **Kayar** » Wed Jun 20, 2012 12:44 pm

You seem to understand more than anyone else, however, Zang.

Devious · Post by **Devious** » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:03 pm

Its clearly the anthem of the Glorious Illuminati.

tokage · Post by **tokage** » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:13 pm

Devious wrote:Its clearly the anthem of the Glorious Illuminati.

Scintilla Numquam intelligere

Devious · Post by **Devious** » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:19 pm

It is our time.

Sparky has properly shown our preeminence.

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:35 am

Explanation:

I am familiar with Valdres March by Johannes Hanssen, but I was looking for information about the actual Valdres Battalion Fanfare upon which it is based.

Upon researching this using Google, all I get are Wikipedia's plagiarized spam results. Look at the results, they are 99% the same, even through the first eleven pages of results.

Therefore, I get the distinct impression that Google is favoring Wikipedia, and Wikipedia in general is vastly overused as a reference and is a source of immense plagiarism.

I would like to stress the importance of the fact that Wikipedia is not the endpoint nor the starting point of any proper research method, but is only a little blurb along the way. The same goes for the internet in general and even books in a library. From where is your source of information you accept to be true? This is dangerous.

Smythe · Post by **Smythe** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:34 pm

Oh be quiet, this is not the place for your insistent rambling.
You're entitled to your opinion, just nobody else cares about it.

TaxiService · Post by **TaxiService** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:51 pm

Try using another search engine. Google filters the results that gives to you on the base of your previous searches. Probably our search results aren't even the same as yours. I am using duckduckgo right now, but any other search engine could work, i guess.

Or, well, if you put "-wikipedia" in the google search field, it will exclude any results containing the word "wikipedia" in them.

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:43 pm

Speaking of the privacy problems on the internet -- basically, meaning that whatever you post in this Godforsaken thing is completely public and can be used to identify you personally -- also reminds me of how I sent an e-mail to the bible.cc web site and now all of a sudden I get like crazy ass spam email barrages with a "Christian" theme. Yes, I will take that phishing e-mail with some God flavor on it, and no I don't want fries with that.

For freaking crying out loud. This is why I have such problems with people. Somebody throw these people into prison already.

Mac Gaming Mods

I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

What the.

I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Re: I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM HERE PEOPLE. A SERIOUS PROBLEM.

Who is online