Bush and Iraq

Yummy · Post by **Yummy** » Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:27 pm

WHAT? Are you telling me that he can't write that Bush lied to the whole nation? I don't care who you are, you have the right to do that. The appropriate way to handle it if he did commit some sort of crime is not to tell the world he is in the CIA, it's to fire him. That's bad ethics to release someone's name from the CIA. That's what Bush does, he takes some tiny little piece of evidence or whatever he calls it, then takes it and says HERES PROOF THAT....blah blah blah....and most of the time the evidence is either false or so minuscule that it serves no purpose. Ahem Iraq, there was a "evidence" (CIA found no WMD's there) then bush said there was some link between saddam and al qaida (actually those 2 groups hate each other) and then released that. Then told his right wing buddies in Congress who of course would support anything bullshitty like that....so we went to war in Iraq (we should've been more devoted to Afghan.)

?mike? · Post by **?mike?** » Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:39 pm

ok so you are denying the fact that the intellegence that Bush received from the CIA was wrong. Bush acted upon what he was told not what he thought. At the time there was supposed intelellegence of WMD's we now know that this is false or they are hidden but most likely false.

this is all a fault of our intellegence agency and Bush acted upon what they thought they "knew" was happening.

Trinity. · Post by **Trinity.** » Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:52 pm

I'm so damn lazy to read the BIG posts made by Yummy and mavrick.

Yay!

Sephiroth Clock · Post by **Sephiroth Clock** » Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:55 pm

I for one welcome our new civil-war like chaos in Iraq.

8bitlove · Post by **8bitlove** » Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:50 am

You guys never cease to amaze me with your constant arguing and flaming. Anyways:
1. Saddam was a jackass who needed to be taken out, but not by us, until
2. Saddam was helping fund terrorism, which made him our problem.
3. We should have kept priorities on finding al-Quida, and just bombed Saddam's palaces into pieces without giving warning so he couldn't get out.
4. Bush is a dumbass.
5. Kerry would have already put us in North Korea.

But those are just my opinions...

?mike? · Post by **?mike?** » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:14 pm

yeah i dont approve very much of Bush but i definately would not have liked that dumass kerry in office. I do believe that the US should have, if it would be possible to do legally with the US laws, assassinated Saddam.

8bitlove · Post by **8bitlove** » Thu Dec 07, 2006 9:25 am

It may be against US law, but we can do damn near anything with a Cuban citizen, tin foil, and $5 American...

?Demon 2.0? · Post by **?Demon 2.0?** » Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:23 pm

YAAAAAAAY! Flame war!

I'd love to write pages and pages of flames and argue, but I have to pack up for a trip to a debate tournament to.......argue with people. XD

draconic74 · Post by **draconic74** » Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:18 pm

Politics is simply incredible. They choose two idiots, then ask which you would rather have...

"Would you like turds or dung?"

....XD

Mad Max · Post by **Mad Max** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:55 am

here is my theory about the whole bush thing... i believe... alquida and saddamn and eveything would not have happend if clinton was still in office... u know why... cause clinton was a smart man... alquida was waiting for clinton to be replaced by a dumbas... hence Bush.. alquida was counting on exactly what Bush did... go to iraq start a war.... alquida gets more popular... gets more recruits.. more ppl hate USA so on and so forth.. clinton would not have done that, clinton would have spent a while constulting his options.. and making sure what he decided was thw right thing to do. it took just weeks for Bush to decide wat to do.. clinton would have set up a very, very tight security all around USA for atleast a year or 2... and probally send in... spec ops.. to iraq... whilst he is consulting his options.

?mike? · Post by **?mike?** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:23 pm

i can see it now clinton builds a large stone wall around the border of the US along with a forcefield and a full battle cruiser fleet... and then he does every woment in this fleet and procedes to deny it.

KingYaba · Post by **KingYaba** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:35 pm

8bitlove wrote:Y
5. Kerry would have already put us in North Korea.

But those are just my opinions...

Kerry doesn't have the balls to do anything that provocative.

Iraq is a mess because 1. Democracy must be earned, not given (my philosophy) and thus the Iraqi people are not stepping up to the plate... Lead a horse to water, but you can't make 'em drink, ya know?

2. Need more troops to quell he violence

Mike, maybe you'll agree with Michael Savage in saying Liberalism is a mental disorder?

Just keep in mind democrats are donkeys more ways then one.

?mike? · Post by **?mike?** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:26 pm

that is hilarious i have never though of it as a mental disorder. it totally fits though. why didnt i see it before??

Mad Max · Post by **Mad Max** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:23 pm

LOOL.. so... heres a vote.... who is better........ or.. who is less of a Turd...

Kerry....

Bush...

Clinton...

?mike? · Post by **?mike?** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:08 am

i dont think any of them are that good. I also think kerry is a dumbass and likes trying uses his "service in war" for an advantage that wont help him anyways.

Mac Gaming Mods

Bush and Iraq

Who is online